2020 Outline - First Period Package (21 Modules) Comments

Date: 9/29/2022 1:51:53 PM
Module: 160101bB
Version: 24
Page: 26
Comment: Along with the CSA rating type for the ladders we should include the CSA colour code for the same ladders. This is a standard used on all sites and I believe we should teach the student accordingly.
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 6/16/2021 8:42:55 AM
Module: 160101c
Version: 22
Page: 3
Comment: Figure 1 should be updated to read SDS instead of MSDS.
Status: Update in Progress

Date: 10/25/2022 8:50:06 AM
Module: 160101c
Version: 24
Page: 3
Comment: Figure 1 shows MSDS in the info graphic. It should be changed to SDS
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 10/26/2022 9:09:32 AM
Module: 160102aB
Version: 24
Page:
Comment: There are no page numbers.
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 11/28/2022 10:46:57 AM
Module: 160102aB
Version: 24
Page: 14
Comment: Figure 15 is captioned incorrectly. The caption should read "Cross Filing".
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 1/24/2023 11:22:03 AM
Module: 160102bA
Version: 24
Page: 45
Comment: The list of safety rules for "Offhand" grinders (like a mini-grinder) is for the most part a list for "On-hand grinders (Bench grinder). Either move the list to the area dealing with bench grinders or revise the list.
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 11/1/2022 2:33:58 PM
Module: 160102c
Version: 24
Page: 15
Comment: The reference to the table at the top of the page is not the correct reference. It is referring to an abrasive wheel, which is not in this module.
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 11/1/2022 3:31:35 PM
Module: 160102cA
Version: 24
Page: 58
Comment: Missing section heading between bevelled washers and preload washers.
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 11/29/2022 8:37:26 AM
Module: 160103aA
Version: 24
Page:
Comment: There is no description of lines of symmetry in the technical drawings modules (160103bA and B). Lines of symmetry are used to describe a part that is symmetrical on ether side of the line. Please add this section to the modules. Page 20 of 160103bB has the symbol but no description. Page 21 of the same module has a different symbol describing symmetry. Please remove the symbol on page 21.
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 11/29/2022 8:37:11 AM
Module: 160103bA
Version: 24
Page:
Comment: The technical drawings modules (160103bA and B) do not include a description of break lines. Break lines are used to show long parts on a drawing. Please add this section.
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 12/14/2022 1:29:09 PM
Module: 160103bA
Version: 24
Page: 60
Comment: Figure 70 has a feature that is distorted in the front view. The front view of the part should have a t slot like the front view of figure 71. Figure 70 also has been labelled to identify 4 surfaces, but the surfaces are not labelled A, B, C, or D.
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 12/14/2022 1:29:35 PM
Module: 160103bA
Version: 24
Page: 61
Comment: Figure 71 has not been labelled to identify the surfaces being described in the paragraph above. Please label the correct surfaces A and B.
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 11/29/2022 9:43:13 AM
Module: 160103bB
Version:
Page:
Comment: Module self-test (Pg 55) has the answers (Pg 64) in the incorrect order and should be edited accordingly: Question #8 correct answer is #11 Question #9 correct answer is #12 Question #10 correct answer is #13 Question #11 correct answer is #14 Question #12 correct answer is #10 Question #13 correct answer is #8 Question #14 correct answer is #9 Question #15 is a repeat of question #12
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 11/30/2022 1:27:22 PM
Module: 160103bB
Version: 24
Page:
Comment: Objective 4 Activity 2 (Pg 45) has the Answers (Pg 62) has answers in the incorrect order. There are 13 answers to 12 questions one of which is irrelevant to the questions. Answer# 7 should be removed and then all answers need to be re-numbered to correct the error. Question# 7 should be answer #8. Q#8 should be A#9. Q#9 should be A#10. Q#10 should be A#11. Q#11 should be A#12. Q#12 should be A#13. Thanks for your time.
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 12/14/2022 4:09:41 PM
Module: 160103bB
Version: 24
Page: 30
Comment: For ease of teaching, it would be better if the single line piping information in 160103bA was moved into 160103bB. Part B does a better job of introducing the concept of single line drawings and it would be better if it was all in one place. The objective that discusses drawing symbols is in part B with the majority of the other single line stuff.
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 1/6/2023 11:31:21 AM
Module: 160104C
Version: 24
Page: 7
Comment: In the last sentence before the heading "Bed" it states "The spindle can be locked in place with the 'tailstock' clamp. It should read 'spindle clamp'. The tailstock is locked in place using the tailstock clamp.
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 1/24/2023 11:21:49 AM
Module: 160105b
Version: 24
Page:
Comment: Calculating Alignment Tolerance The formula being used for the offset calulating is incorrect. Should be the TIR Rim reading divided by 2. What is given is the formula for calculating the shim move at the motor feet.
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 1/24/2023 11:37:26 AM
Module: 160105b
Version: 24
Page:
Comment: Self Test Question 16 Missing the sign on "11" and "5". The answer given is also wrong. If "11" is positive the answer would be +29. If "11" is negative the answer would be +7. If "5" is positive the answer would be +7. If "5" is negative the answer would be -3. Qusetion 17 The missing number on the Rim would be -15. (-22 - -7 = -15) The missing number on the Face would be -4. (-3 - +1 = -4) The answers in the back are wrong for both question 16 and 17.
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 11/9/2021 9:38:18 AM
Module: 160205d
Version: 21
Page:
Comment: Figures 13 and 14 are missing surface identification that is described in the paragraphs above them. There are circles for the identifiers to be located, but they are missing. Figure 13 also has distortion in the front view. The Tee slot is misshapen. It should look like the front view in figure 14.
Status: Approved for Review

Date: 11/9/2021 9:44:32 AM
Module: 160205e
Version: 21
Page: 5
Comment: Figure 3 shows the dimension convention for piping. Page 4 describes flanges being dimensioned to their face, however figure 3 does not show the flange dimensioned. Please add an extension line and dimension line to the flange on all 3 of the drawings in figure 3.
Status: Approved for Review


Archived Comments

11/26/2021 10:25:52 AM
Module: 160102bA
Version:
Page:
Comment: Figure 57. This picture shows two micrometers, one without a vernier scale and one with. In the second half of the pic on the vernier micrometer the thimble is not showing the same measurement. Notice the index line. That second half of that pic or vernier micrometer needs to show the proper measurement in addition to the Vernier lines lining up.
Status: Implemented

11/26/2021 10:19:59 AM
Module: 160102bA
Version:
Page:
Comment: Figure 65 doesn't match the text before it. The material before this picture refers to the picture and explains how to read a depth micrometer and gives a specific measurement of .850. The picture does not show the .850 of an inch as described above. The original drawing that was replaced did. This new pic needs updating.
Status: Implemented

11/26/2021 10:14:41 AM
Module: 160102bA
Version:
Page:
Comment: In 102bA ,Figure 33, this picture only shows the 50 division vernier on the Metric side while there is a 25 division vernier on the Imperial side. The Material is clearly talking about Imperial 50 division verniers. This pic is a replacement of a drawing that was better suited
Status: Implemented

11/2/2021 9:24:09 AM
Module: 160106gB
Version: 21
Page:
Comment: Objective 5 exercise 3 answer key has conflicting information. The answer on page 39 for #3 o) mentions 10 threads, but could be interpreted as 8 threads if using a key that is 3/8" from the note on the drawing. Please remove the note in the question stating the key is 1/4 the size of the shaft, which is 1 inch as it creates confusion. The answer should be 8 threads not 10. For 8 threads: The depth of the threaded hole is 0.55". The note at the bottom of fig 35 mentions the keyway is 3/8". Assuming half the key sits in the shaft and the other half sits in the keyway, we can say the depth of the keyway is half of 3/8" which is 0.1875". The question says there is a 2 thou clearance. The thread has a pitch of 0.0416". Solution 0.55 - 0.1875 - 0.002= 0.3605 ÷ 0.0416 = 8.67 threads.
Status: Implemented

10/26/2021 11:40:41 AM
Module: 160106gA
Version: 21
Page: 37
Comment: The second bullet point is describing the width dimension of a woodruff key. It mentions it is given in 30-seconds of an inch. It should be changed to 32nds of an inch. Using the number 30 creates the idea that the measurement fraction has a denominator of 30 not 32.
Status: Implemented

2/22/2021 12:41:36 PM
Module: 160103g
Version: 21
Page: 23
Comment: The middle paragraph describing the preload washer should have a heading before the paragraph as it is not part of the bevel washer information.
Status: Implemented

2/3/2021 10:20:00 AM
Module: 160105b
Version: 21
Page:
Comment: Self test question 14. The correct answer is not available as an option. The correct answer is move 12 toward the datum. If the face reads zero at 3:00 and 9:00 positions, it would make the first part of the formula become zero. S1=L1 / D × tirF - tirR/2 becomes S1= 0- tirR/2 which means the answer for S1 or S2 is +12 mil. According to page 23 - we move positive answers toward the datum (Zero) which means the answer is 12 mil to 3:00. A possible solution or fix could be to change option c) to read: move 12 mils toward the datum line.
Status: Implemented

2/3/2021 9:58:00 AM
Module: 160105a
Version: 21
Page: 12
Comment: The top paragraph on page 12 is still talking about the information from the previous page. The heading for Vibration isolators should be above the next paragraph where it begins to talk about the isolators.
Status: Implemented

10/1/2020 10:42:40 AM
Module: 160103aB
Version: 21
Page: 21
Comment: figure 20 does not show serial taps. these are standard taps with lines drawn on them. The picture should show that the pitch diameter is different between the 3 taps. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gewindeschneider_01_KMJ.jpg
Status: Implemented

9/21/2020 9:56:25 AM
Module: 160101a
Version: 22
Page: 15
Comment: Figure 5 Binder name should be updated to SDS
Status: Declined

8/27/2020 10:26:39 AM
Module: 160101dA
Version: 22
Page: 23
Comment: Figure 20 shows a pipe hanger but not a lift ring. See this website for reference. https://www.mazzellacompanies.com/Resources/Blog/what-is-a-hoist-ring-different-types-installation-parts
Status: Implemented

8/27/2020 10:13:19 AM
Module: 160101b
Version: 21
Page:
Comment: Figures 48, 49, and 50 do not show what the description is saying. Here is a link to some examples of pictures that match the descriptions. http://unirope.com/products/slings/wire-rope-slings/rigging-guidelines/use-of-choker-and-basket-hitches/
Status: Implemented

8/21/2020 1:16:51 PM
Module: 160106b
Version: 21
Page: 2
Comment: There is no definition of the term fraction in the chart. It shows a good example but needs a definition. A fraction represents a part of a whole or, more generally, any number of equal parts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraction
Status: Declined

8/21/2020 12:52:14 PM
Module: 160106b
Version: 21
Page: 2
Comment: In the definition of the term Equivalent Fractions there is a note "Error! Reference source not found." It should read "Figure 1 illustrates..."
Status: Implemented

Return to Comments   Order Modules